![]() ![]() ![]() Installing the patch requires Admin privileges but is fairly straightforward and doesn’t require too much tech knowledge. When we first set up our Mac to work with an eGPU it was necessary to download and install a patch. So don’t move to the next step before backing up. As you will see from the next step, if everything goes wrong you may need to reinstall MacOS, losing all your data in the process. Here’s how to use a Blackmagic eGPU with an older Mac:īefore you begin we recommend that you back up your Mac. We didn’t use an external display in our test, as we’re more interested in video and photography editing app performance. With Mojave running, you also no longer require to have an external display connected for it to work – unless you want to of course. You can use High Sierra as well, but the latest OS offers a simpler way to choose which apps use the external eGPU hardware when it is connected. You also need to be running the latest macOS, which at the time of writing is MacOS Mojave 10.14.5. You’ll also need a separate Thunderbolt 2 to 2 cable in addition, but it’s likely you already have one if you have previously plugged anything into your Thunderbolt port. There are some third party adapters, but we would recommend sticking to Apple’s own one which we know works – and should continue to work after any software updates (£49/$49,īuy it here). If like us, you want to use an eGPU with an older MacBook, with a Thunderbolt 2 or even version 1 interface, the first thing you will require is a USB-C to Thunderbolt adaptor. This test seemingly shows the Retina MacBook Air score right in-between the 12-inch MacBook and the 13-inch MacBook Pro without Touch Bar, which is coincidentally exactly how the Mac lineup looks in terms of pricing.įor more details on how the current MacBook lineup compares, be sure to read our full comparison right here.Before you start, make sure you buy the correct hardware and that you have a compatible Mac. Geekbench scores aren’t always the best indicator of real-world performance, but they do offer general insight on how machines compare to one another. Single-core testing is closer, with the Pro scoring 4504. Last but not least, the MacBook Air is blown out of the water by the 2018 13-inch MacBook Pro, which scores a 16464 in multi-score testing, more than double the Air. In terms of multi-core, the Pro is 16 percent faster, according to Geekbench scores. Meanwhile, the MacBook Air offers similar performance improvements compared to the base model 12-inch MacBook, with a 20 percent improvement in single-core and a 17 percent increase in multi-core.Īs for the mid-2017 MacBook Pro without Touch Bar – which is priced $100 more than the Retina MacBook Air, the Pro scores roughly the same in single-core with a 4314 score. In terms of comparison to the mid-2017 MacBook Air, which features a 5th-generation dual-core Intel Core i5 processor at 1.8GHz, the 2018 Retina MacBook is roughly 27 percent faster in single-core and 28 percent faster in multi-core. On Geekbench, the new Retina MacBook Air with a 1.6GHz dual-core 8th-gen Intel Core i5 processor scores a ~4200 in single-core testing and ~7800 in multi-core testing. This comes after we saw the first iPad Pro 2018 Geekbench results this morning, which proved Apple’s claims about besting most PCs – including its own – true. Now, the first MacBook Air Geekbench scores are starting to hit the web and give more detail on that processor. Apple’s latest Retina MacBook Air has drawn some criticism over its processor choice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |